|
Are our problems as big as we think they are? Problems often appear
unsolvable on the surface. We feel a certain direction is the wrong
way to go and yet we can’t think of another possible direction to
take. The result is we may feel without hope for a viable and
practical solution. At such a moment, our dismay becomes consuming,
overwhelming and ultimately — paralyzing.
But perhaps the barrier to our thinking is our thinking. It could
be that the most important factor in problem solving is how we
approach the problem.
When difficulties arise, evaluate your first impression of the
dilemma. Some say our first impressions of a problem may be similar
to our first impressions of people. Ask yourself — “Are my first
impressions narrow and superficial?” Harboring stereotyped notions
will cloud vision, confuse reason and stifle imagination.
Perspective can outline and limit options and ideas and thus
hamper results and resolutions. Indeed some have said — and proven —
that a new view of a problem can lead to a solution.
I’ve read that when Einstein approached a problem, he found it
necessary to formulate the subject in as many different ways as
possible. He was once asked what he would do if he were told that a
huge comet would hit Earth in an hour. He said he would spend 55
minutes figuring out how to formulate the question and 5 minutes
solving it.
It seems his emphasis was not so much on defining troubles, but
on considering alternate points of view. He apparently expected this
process to inspire the elucidation that would lead to a feasible
answer.
This approach to problem-solving suggests that when considering
any predicament, we should try to restate the question at least 5 to
10 times to generate multiple perspectives about a problem. This
method intrigued me and I’ve been putting it to my own test. I’ve
discovered that what I often perceive to be an insurmountable
problem will suddenly become solvable.
One day my question was: “How can I find sufficient time in my
day to do all that I need to accomplish?” Admittedly, I knew at the
outset that there was no answer that could add more hours to a
24-hour day. As I continued restating my question, the problem
turned out to not really be a question of time as much as it was the
need for practical daily goal-setting. Implementing Einstein’s
problem-solving method has helped my days become more satisfying,
productive and progressive.
Before trying Einstein’s approach, I was trapped in a daily
pattern of complaining about not having enough time and consequently
I never found a day with enough hours in it.
It’s like the story I once read about the housefly. I suspect
we’ve all had flies trapped inside of our house who frantically buzz
in front of a big glass window desperately trying to get back
outside but can’t. Again and again, the fly hits the window going
nowhere. And yet, all it has to do is go back through the open
screen door which it likely came through. How many dead flies have
we seen on a window sill? The fly dies because it cannot change its
thinking — or approach.
As some unknown author once said, “If you always do what you’ve
always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got.”
Fresh perspective is imperative in finding new ideas and
reasonable answers. And a fresh perspective is only born when we
stop describing or ruminating about a problem in the same old way.
This approach to problem-solving changed many of my questions and
resulted in solutions that were attainable and doable. My question,
“How can I afford a bigger house with more storage space?” was
changed to “How can I use the space in my current house more
efficiently and effectively?” And my question, “How can I lose
weight?” was changed to “What can I do each day to cut back on fat
calories and be more physically active?” In both of these cases, I
found satisfying — as well as immediate — results and solutions.
So do you have a problem that seems impossible to solve? Try
Einstein’s method of problem solving and restate your question at
least five times. You may be surprised how quickly you find an
answer that works!
|